Pyrotechnic Operator Wins Products Liability Appeal

On March 9, 2011, Martin obtained a reversal of a judgment in a products liability case against the manufacturer of a simulated stinger missile.  In the appeal, Martin represented a pyrotechnic operator who was seriously injured when the simulated missile exploded in his face while he was working on a movie set.  The California Court of Appeal found that the trial court had erred by granting summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer on a design defect claim.

Wiley W. Manuel Award

In February 2011, Martin was awarded the California State Bar’s Wiley W. Manuel Award for Pro Bono Legal Services.  This is the second time Martin has received this award for his pro bono appellate work.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Unanimous Decision Against Mazda

On February 23, 2011, Martin won a unanimous decision in the United States Supreme Court.   The case is Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., No. 08-1314.  Martin represented the family of a woman who died in a car crash from injuries caused by a lap-only seatbelt installed in a Mazda minivan.   The Supreme Court ruled that a state tort claim against Mazda for failure to install a lap/shoulder belt was not preempted by federal law.  The majority opinion was written by Justice Breyer, with concurring opinions by Justices Sotomayor and Thomas.  Martin briefed the case and argued it in the Supreme Court on November 3, 2010.

The Advocate Magazine

In the December 2010 issue of The Advocate Magazine, Martin published an article entitled “Answering Questions at Oral Argument.”

Champions of Justice

On November 13, 2010, Martin was the featured guest on Champions of Justice, a radio talk show hosted by attorney Tom Girardi and aired in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Bernardino, and San Diego.

Products Liability Case Argued in U.S. Supreme Court

On November 3, 2010, Martin presented oral argument to the United States Supreme Court in Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc., No. 08-1314.  Martin represents the family of a woman who died in a car accident when she jackknifed over a lap-only seatbelt installed in the aisle seat of a 1993 Mazda mini-van.  The issue before the Supreme Court is whether the plaintiffs’ state common-law claim alleging that Mazda should have installed a combination lap/shoulder belt is preempted by a 1989 federal motor vehicle safety regulation permitting but not requiring lap/shoulder belts for aisle seating positions.

Williamson v. Mazda

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Hormone Replacement Case

On October 12, 2010, the United States Supreme Court declined to review a published decision in favor of Martin’s clients in In re Prempro Products Liability Litigation, 591 F.3d 613 (8th Cir. 2010).   Martin represented 116 plaintiffs who alleged that they developed breast cancer as a result of their use of prescription hormone replacement therapy drugs.  On consolidated appeals from orders dismissing their cases, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis reversed the dismissals and directed the district court to remand the cases to Minnesota state court where they were first filed.

Defenders Board

On October 6, 2010, Martin was elected to the board of Appellate Defenders, Inc. and Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc.